GuaranĂ¡ Blog

UX Design For Users With Visual Disabilities

Written by Guarana | Feb 27, 2024 5:28:22 PM

UX design enhances the web experience for users with visual disabilities by adapting interfaces to meet their specific needs, including providing tailored audio solutions.

This article delves into web accessibility guidelines, highlighting how inclusive designs can benefit everyone. Additionally, it presents UX design methods aimed at optimizing access to digital content for users.

Finally, the focus is on concrete recommendations for crafting welcoming digital experiences.

Understanding Visual Disability and Its Implications

Visual disability encompasses a variety of conditions that affect vision, ranging from mild impairment to total loss of sight.

This diversity results in different types of visual impairments, such as myopia, hyperopia, partial blindness, and total blindness, each presenting unique challenges for individuals affected.

Firstly, navigating non-adapted websites can be complex, as they often rely on visually inaccessible cues. Similarly, text without alternatives for images or videos reduces the understanding of the presented information.

Additionally, complex interfaces or insufficient color contrasts complicate and make the interaction with digital materials frustrating. These challenges highlight the importance of designing digital experiences with built-in accessibility from the outset.

 

Accessibility in UX Design

Accessibility in UX design aims to ensure that digital products and services are usable for users with visual disabilities.

This involves creating interfaces and content tailored to various needs, enabling a rich and barrier-free user experience.

Objective of Accessibility in UX Design

The objective of accessibility in UX design is to create experiences that are open to all, regardless of their physical or cognitive abilities. This involves consideration of the various ways in which people interact with digital interfaces.

This includes, for example, integrating features compatible with screen readers for blind or visually impaired individuals, or adjusting visual elements for those who use screen magnifiers.

Accessibility also requires that content be clear and straightforward, ensuring it is understandable by all.

Standards and Best Practices in Web Accessibility

To guide developers in creating accessible solutions, standards and best practices have been established, notably the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) developed by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C).

These guidelines are considered the gold standard in web accessibility and are regularly updated to address technological advancements and user needs.

The WCAG focuses on four principles, often summarized by the acronym "POUR": Perceivable, Operable, Understandable, and Robust.

These principles aim to ensure that the web page is accessible to all, including those with visual, auditory, motor, or cognitive impairments.

For example, recommendations suggest providing alternative texts for images, ensuring websites are accessible via keyboard navigation, and ensuring content is written in clear and understandable language.

Techniques and Tools of UX Design for Visually Impaired Users

This approach requires understanding the obstacles that these users with visual impairments face in order to provide them with solutions.

1. Limited access to visual information

Without appropriate alternative descriptions, visually impaired users struggle to access visual content. The absence of "alt" tags or alternative texts for images restricts their interaction.

1.1 Alternative text for images

Every image on a website or in an application should have an "alt" attribute detailing concisely and precisely what it represents. This textual description conveys visual information to screen reader users in an accessible manner.

For purely decorative images that do not add significant information, an empty alt attribute (alt="") signals to screen readers to skip them, avoiding overwhelming the user with unnecessary details.

1.2 Descriptions for complex visual content

For visual elements conveying important information, such as charts, tables, or infographics, more detailed descriptions are necessary.

These descriptions can be provided through longer alternative texts, captions, or even dedicated pages explaining the visual content in detail.

1.3  Use of ARIA tags for dynamic content

Interactive or dynamic elements, such as interactive graphics, often require the use of ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) tags. These tags serve to define clear contexts.

This ensures that screen reader users understand how to interact with dynamic content.

1.4 Testing with screen readers

Test alternative and detailed descriptions using different screen readers to ensure they are correctly interpreted and useful.

This includes listening to how descriptions are read aloud and adjusting the language to be clear and easily understandable.

2. Complex Navigation and Structures

Poorly designed website or user interface structure, without clear hierarchy, complicates interaction for screen reader users.

2.1 Establishing a clear hierarchy

  • Using properly structured headers: Organize content with headers (H1, H2, H3, etc.) to mark main sections and subsections. This helps users understand the structure. For example, use an H1 header for the page title, followed by H2 for section headings, and so on.

  • Creating structured lists for menus: Navigation menus should be presented as ordered or unordered lists with appropriate tags, making it easier to understand the organization of the site.

2.2 Clarifying interactive elements

  • Using ARIA roles on widgets: For an image carousel, use ARIA roles to indicate available actions (e.g., aria-controls for navigating between images).

2.3 User testing validation

  • Evaluating with real users: Involve individuals using screen readers in the testing process to obtain direct feedback on the understanding and accessibility of your site or application structure.

3. Contrast and Readability Issues

Low contrast between text and its background, as well as the use of difficult-to-read fonts, make content inaccessible to users with reduced vision.

3.1 Contrast Optimization

To improve readability, ensure high contrast between text and the background. Use online contrast checking tools to facilitate evaluation and adjustment of colors to meet accessibility standards.

Practical Examples:

  • WebAIM's Contrast Checker : This tool evaluates the contrast between text and background colors. Additionally, it provides an overview compliant with WCAG guidelines and suggests adjustments if the contrast is insufficient.
  • Color Safe : Designed to help create accessible color combinations, this tool generates color options for text and background that ensure good visibility for all users.

3.2 Font Choices

Adopting simple fonts significantly contributes to accessibility.

For example, sans-serif fonts like Arial or Helvetica are particularly suitable for people with visual difficulties due to their clarity.

You can also provide the option to adjust text size, meeting individual user needs and greatly enhancing their experience.

Fonts such as Verdana or Calibri, known for their readability, are excellent alternatives in this regard.

3.3 Accessibility Testing

Include accessibility testing in your development process to identify and correct contrast and readability issues.

Examples of Websites and Applications Adapted for Visually Impaired Individuals

Here are some examples of applications and web services that facilitate interaction for users with visual impairments.

  1. Netflix integrates audio descriptions for its content, allowing blind users to follow programs by understanding essential visual elements.
  2. Apple offers VoiceOver, a built-in screen reader tool on its devices. This tool provides simplified access by describing the information displayed on the screen.
  3. Be My Eyes is an application that connects visually impaired users with volunteers through video calls, providing visual assistance for daily activities.