Cross-platform development has entered a new era. In 2025, teams building mobile apps are no longer asking if they should go multiplatform, but how. Among the most discussed frameworks, Flutter and Kotlin Multiplatform stand out not just for their popularity, but for what they represent. These are two radically different philosophies to write code once and run it natively on both Android and iOS.

Flutter, powered by Google and written in Dart, offers a unified UI layer with custom widgets rendered from scratch. KMP, backed by JetBrains, takes another route: it shares the business logic across platforms while keeping native UI intact. For developers, this fundamental difference shapes the project lifecycle, performance, and long-term maintainability.

But which framework truly fits your app’s needs in 2025? Whether you're building your first MVP or scaling a complex mobile solution, this guide compares performance, speed, tooling, and the developer experience across both Flutter and KMP. We'll also look at real-world use cases, ecosystem maturity, and the cost of ownership to help you make a confident choice.

Kotlin Multiplatform in 2025

What It Is & Why It Matters

Kotlin Multiplatform is no longer a niche option. In 2025, it anchors cross-platform strategies that prioritize reuse without flattening the visual identity of each system. Unlike frameworks that unify UI and behavior, KMP distributes roles cleanly.

Processes like data access, API layers or internal rules can be reused, while screens remain tailored to Android or iOS standards. JetBrains does promote Compose Multiplatform for shared visuals, but many still prefer native rendering on iOS. SwiftUI and UIKit remain go-to solutions when full access to system features or advanced interaction design is needed.

This setup avoids common compromises in speed, accessibility, and interaction quality. For teams already using Kotlin, KMP integrates naturally into existing Android projects and extends to iOS without rebuilding from scratch. Its progressive adoption model fits well with long-term mobile strategies that demand consistency and deep native integration.

Teams choosing this architecture often gain more than flexibility.

how Kotlin Multiplatform saves time and cuts development costs

Still deciding between Flutter, KMP, and other tools?

Compare frameworks in our mobile app development guide

Pros and Cons at a Glance

Pros

  • Shared business logic across platforms : The core code can be written once in Kotlin and reused across Android, iOS, and other platforms, reducing duplication and maintenance effort.
  • Platform-native rendering : By keeping the UI layer native, apps maintain platform-specific performance and user experience on both mobile systems.
  • Backed by JetBrains with growing ecosystem : The framework benefits from active support and continuous improvements.
  • Selective sharing flexibility : You can decide what parts of the project to reuse and what to build natively. This modular approach lets you adjust the structure to suit the technical and product goals of each platform.

Cons

  • iOS integration requires native expertise : Even if the Android team leads the project using Kotlin Multiplatform, building the iOS UI still demands Swift/SwiftUI knowledge. iOS developers are needed to finalize visuals and integrate smoothly into the Apple-native environment.
  • Tooling and libraries still maturing : While progressing steadily, the ecosystem remains less comprehensive than Flutter’s, and some features demand custom implementations or external integrations.
  • Slower for visual prototyping : If the goal is to build fast with a single UI codebase, frameworks like Flutter or React Native may offer a shorter path.

Flutter in 2025

Overview & Current Positioning

Built with the Dart programming language, Flutter enables the creation of rich and responsive visuals using its own rendering engine and widget system.

Unlike KMP, which separates visual presentation from shared logic, Flutter takes a full-stack approach. It handles everything from layout to animations internally, without relying on platform-native components. This gives full control over how the app behaves and appears on various devices.

Its structure appeals to companies aiming for consistency, faster iteration cycles, and a uniform experience across devices. Many applications built with Flutter stand out for their smooth performance and polished visuals, even when the design involves advanced animations or interactive elements.

Flutter continues to be a go-to option for startups and growing digital products aiming for rapid launches, lower costs, and simplified maintenance. It also competes seriously with React Native for those looking to streamline workflows without sacrificing design freedom or interaction quality.

Pros and Cons for Developers

Pros

  • Single codebase across platforms : One codebase written in Dart can target Android, iOS, web, and Desktop. This reduces maintenance effort and accelerates releases.
  • Same rendering behavior on all platforms : Flutter provides its own rendering engine, ensuring a unified look and behavior regardless of platform. This helps brands maintain a coherent visual identity.
  • Fast development with hot reload : Changes in code are visible almost instantly, helping developers prototype, debug, and iterate quickly.
  • Large community and growing support : The framework benefits from wide adoption, strong community involvement, and continuous improvements from Google.
  • Rich set of tools and libraries : Flutter offers a large ecosystem of libraries, ready-to-use widgets, and performance monitoring tools that simplify the development process.

Cons

  • Custom rendering may limit native integration : Flutter doesn't rely on native UI elements, so connecting to certain OS-level features sometimes involves setting up custom channels or additional plugins built by the community.
  • Adapting to Dart and Flutter’s model : Developers unfamiliar with Dart or Flutter’s declarative model may need time to adapt if they come from native Kotlin or Swift backgrounds.
  • App size and performance overhead : Flutter apps can result in larger binaries and may need additional optimization to run smoothly on entry-level hardware.
  • Lag in platform adaptation : Since Flutter abstracts the UI layer, aligning with the latest OS-level innovations can take longer, depending on how quickly the framework adapts.

Flutter vs Kotlin Multiplatform: The 2025 Comparison

1. Performance and Speed

Kotlin Multiplatform

  • Uses native components directly : KMP relies on system-level APIs and rendering, which ensures fast execution and close integration with device-specific features.
  • No extra rendering layer : With no intermediary framework between logic and UI, it minimizes latency and overhead.
  • Efficient with intensive tasks : Complex processes implemented in Kotlin benefit from near-native speed, ideal for data-heavy applications.

Flutter

  • Uses native components directly : KMP relies on system-level APIs and rendering, which ensures fast execution and close integration with device-specific features.
  • No extra rendering layer : With no intermediary framework between logic and UI, it minimizes latency and overhead.
  • Efficient with intensive tasks : Complex processes implemented in Kotlin benefit from near-native speed, ideal for data-heavy applications.
  • Custom engine for unified rendering : Drawing everything via Skia allows Flutter to maintain smooth visuals across environments.
  • Performance may vary by complexity : Apps using intensive animations or running on limited hardware often benefit from additional tuning to match native performance levels.
  • Responsive but memory-hungry : Applications generally run well, though they may consume more memory than platform-specific alternatives.

2. Logic Sharing and App Design

Kotlin Multiplatform

  • Share logic, keep native UI : Only the backend, networking, and core layers are reused. Visual elements are built separately using native tools.
  • Precision in modularization : Projects can define exactly which layers are shared and which remain tailored to the target system.

Flutter

  • Unified structure : One Dart project manages both layout and logic, reducing the need to switch between different stacks.
  • Tightly coupled design : Layout and functionality live in the same flow, which simplifies early-stage development.
  • Limited out-of-the-box native access : Custom integration is sometimes needed for platform-specific behaviors.

3. Visual Design and Customization

Kotlin Multiplatform

  • Uses native toolkits : Design is handled via Jetpack Compose, SwiftUI, or UIKit, offering full compatibility with OS expectations.
  • Greater design freedom : Motion design, accessibility, and gestures can be tailored without constraints from an external engine.
  • No cross-platform rendering system : Each platform handles its own visuals, preserving the native look and feel.

Flutter

  • Custom engine for seamless rendering : Apps look the same everywhere due to Flutter's self-contained rendering.
  • Strong animation tools : The widget system provides fine-grained control over transitions and layout.
  • Native look requires effort : Achieving platform fidelity takes additional adjustments.

4. Productivity and Tooling

Kotlin Multiplatform

  • Fast core development : Shared Kotlin code accelerates business logic and data handling.
  • UI built per target : Screens still need to be implemented individually using native IDEs.
  • Strong Android integration : Seamless experience with Android Studio; iOS integration improving.

Flutter

  • Hot reload accelerates iteration Developers can preview changes instantly, speeding up testing and prototyping.
  • Integrated dev environment All major tools come bundled and work across systems without setup hurdles.
  • End-to-end in one place Layout, behavior, and debugging live under a single workflow.

5. Community and Ecosystem

Kotlin Multiplatform

  • Supported by JetBrains : Backed by JetBrains, the original creators, with ongoing investment that guarantees a long-term vision.
  • Smaller contributor base : While growing, it remains more focused and technically inclined.
  • Ecosystem still expanding : Some libraries and integrations are still maturing, with iOS support progressing more gradually than on Android.

Flutter

  • Widespread global use : Vibrant activity across GitHub, Stack Overflow, and community forums.
  • Mature package ecosystem : Thousands of libraries available for visuals, logic, and system access.
  • Refined resources : Well-maintained docs, templates, and guides support new and experienced developers.

6. Cost and Maintenance

Kotlin Multiplatform

  • Minimizes repeated logic : Business code can be centralized, saving effort during development.
  • UI managed separately : Front-end elements must be maintained separately, increasing effort when adapting layouts or user interactions.
  • Gradual adoption possible : Existing projects can integrate KMP progressively.

Flutter

  • Single team, broad delivery : One project covers multiple environments, simplifying staffing and planning.
  • Unified maintenance path : Bug fixes and changes propagate across targets instantly.
  • Deep OS integration may add costs : Workarounds or native bridges might be needed for full feature parity.


7. Platform Reach and Limitations

Kotlin Multiplatform

  • Solid mobile foundation : Android and iOS are well covered; the former is seamless, the latter stable via Kotlin/Native.
  • Emerging desktop and web targets : Support exists but varies by use case and framework maturity.
  • Visual independence is a trade-off : No shared UI means more effort upfront but greater fidelity long-term.

Flutter

  • Runs on mobile, desktop, and web : Thanks to Dart’s cross-platform reach, a single build can target multiple environments.
  • Best suited for mobile-first strategies : The strongest performance and support still reside in smartphone use cases.
  • API parity not guaranteed : New OS-level features might be delayed by abstraction layers.

 

Which Framework Fits Your App’s Needs?

Choose Flutter if... Choose Kotlin Multiplatform if...
You want to build for iOS, Android , web, and desktop from a single codebase You want to reuse core logic but design each platform's screens separately
You're looking to do full hybrid but are looking for something much more powerful than React Native in terms of performance Your team already works in Kotlin and aims to expand to other targets
You prioritize speed for prototyping or MVPs You want to build the most stable code possible for your iOS and Android project
Your team is comfortable learning Dart and Flutter’s widget system Your project needs deep platform-specific features or OS-level APIs

You want a consistent and uniform UI across all devices

 You want each platform to retain its native design experience


Real-World Cross-Platform Apps Built with Kotlin Multiplatform and Flutter

Built with Flutter

  • Google Ads : The official Google Ads mobile app uses Flutter to streamline campaign tracking and ads management across platforms.
  • Alibaba (Xianyu) : Flutter powers key components of Alibaba’s Xianyu marketplace app, improving visual consistency and reducing feature rollout time by approximately 50%.
  • Reflectly : This AI-based journaling app delivers smooth animations and a refined visual design thanks to Flutter’s rendering engine and widget system.

Built with Kotlin Multiplatform

  • Netflix : Relies on Kotlin Multiplatform for internal video production tooling, with roughly half the business logic shared across Android and iOS. This setup improves rollout speed and ensures reliable behavior across mobile clients.
  • VMware : Implements a common foundation for networking and authentication layers in its enterprise apps, cutting time-to-market by up to 40%.
  • Philips : Applies shared Kotlin code for Bluetooth communication, data handling, and validation in its healthcare apps. This approach improves reliability and helps meet regulatory requirements, reducing critical errors by 35%.
  • Forbes : Achieves over 80% code reuse across mobile platforms, enabling faster feature delivery and simplified app maintenance.
  • Stylist : Our team built Stylist using Kotlin Multiplatform to launch on Android and iOS from a single codebase. The app lets users book beauty appointments, explore local providers, and engage through a social feed. Flutter’s widget system made it easy to create a polished, interactive UI quickly.


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Is Kotlin Multiplatform replacing Flutter?

No. The two follow different philosophies. Flutter uses Dart and provides a single UI codebase for fast development. KMP keeps native UI and shares backend functions across platforms. Both fit different types of projects.

Which is better for sharing code in mobile apps: Flutter or KMP?

KMP allows more flexibility when native design matters. Flutter unifies both UI and app structure using Dart, which speeds up prototyping but limits access to platform-specific features.


Can you mix Kotlin Multiplatform with an existing native app?

Yes. One major advantage is its modular adoption. You can bring in shared features without altering the visual layer, making it ideal for enterprise or legacy projects.


Is Kotlin Multiplatform ready for production use?

Yes. It’s already used in live apps to unify backend tasks like data sync, API calls, and business rules across Android, iOS, and beyond. While Compose Multiplatform is maturing for UI, many still prefer SwiftUI or UIKit for advanced iOS layouts or behaviors.


How does Kotlin Multiplatform compare to React Native?

React Native merges UI and app logic through JavaScript. KMP, in contrast, isolates reusable code and lets designers work with native components. It's a strong choice when performance, animations, or deep OS integration are key.

SHARE ON

by Guarana
Filed under App Funding
Tagged App Development